| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
1. Sticky:[Rubicon 1.1] Sisters of EVE Battleship - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
ASadOldGit wrote: Arthur Aihaken wrote: I think the best alternative is to postpone it... I'm inclined to agree. There's been a few threads about battleships being dead or useless over the last few months, and the marauders threadnaught wa...
- by Savira Terrant - at 2014.01.15 02:01:00
|
2. Sticky:[Rubicon 1.1] Sisters of EVE Battleship - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
PopeUrban wrote: Simple idea: What if we left its current middle of the road bonuses, and gave it its own module: Remote Computation Subprocessor (high) This module adds +10 to targeted ships virus strength. This module reduces targeted ship...
- by Savira Terrant - at 2014.01.14 20:01:00
|
3. Sticky:[Rubicon 1.1] Sisters of EVE Battleship - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Please guys. Why do you start asking for a covert cloak and the RR bonuses? Just drop RR already and make this ship usable to support exploration. And yes if that means it will end up as a 2 billion (or whatever) non plus ultra anom and DED runn...
- by Savira Terrant - at 2014.01.13 23:48:00
|
4. Sticky:[Rubicon 1.1] Sisters of EVE Battleship - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Arthur Aihaken wrote: Right, because they're so fast those darned things... Good luck being in warp fast enough. Even if you are, they will just have another chance at the next gate.
- by Savira Terrant - at 2014.01.12 04:41:00
|
5. Sticky:[Rubicon 1.1] Sisters of EVE Battleship - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Arthur Aihaken wrote: Arne Aratur wrote: Yes, but we have reached a point where it's hard to find a niche for new ships. And I can't see what's the advantage of this besides being pretty. This one's niche is exploration. Give it a Covert O...
- by Savira Terrant - at 2014.01.12 03:10:00
|
6. Move Downtime - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
CCP Falcon wrote: ¦É> -Ö+»¦¥+Ñ-ç +ƒo ¦¥+¦+É+ö ¦¥-P+É-ç o-ç -Äl-P+öߦënb puods¦¥+¦ u+É+ö ¦¥-ì s¦¥nssß¦ë ¦¥+¦+É ¦¥+¦¦¥+Ñ-ç +ƒß¦ë -ç+É+Ñ-ç su+ɦ¥+» pu+É -Ä+Ép-P+¦o-ì +¦no +ƒo ¦¥lppߦë+» ¦¥+Ñ-ç uߦë -ç+Ѧâߦë+¦ sll+É+ƒ s-çߦë s+É '¦¥+öu+Éu¦¥-çu...
- by Savira Terrant - at 2014.01.12 00:56:00
|
7. Sticky:[Rubicon 1.1] Sisters of EVE Battleship - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Silvetica Dian wrote: [quote=Omnathious Deninard] My alliance mates have tested it on sisi as a spider tanked BS and run it against spider tanked domi's. It is far far superior to the domi in that set up. And we need a "superior" Dominix for ...
- by Savira Terrant - at 2014.01.11 16:15:00
|
8. Sticky:[Rubicon 1.1] Sisters of EVE Battleship - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Vladimir Norkoff wrote: Well still can't think of a useful purpose for this ship. .. Maybe a possible solution is to start adding in Hack/Relic stuff to missions? That way it could be useful there. Not saying that the Hack/Relic should be need...
- by Savira Terrant - at 2014.01.09 22:27:00
|
9. Sticky:[Rubicon 1.1] Sisters of EVE Battleship - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Kagura Nikon wrote: Rise, please read this: I know sometimes I am a bit.. agressive when I complain of your ideas. But this time I agree with you. But I hope you can take this as an opportunity to eveluate somethign. Why people think all these...
- by Savira Terrant - at 2014.01.09 22:07:00
|
10. Sticky:[Rubicon 1.1] Sisters of EVE Battleship - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
James Amril-Kesh wrote: PotatoOverdose wrote: CCP Rise wrote: I think a jump drive would mean redesigning the entire ship. TBH this might be a good idea with or without the jump drive. Let's take a step back for a minute, because th...
- by Savira Terrant - at 2014.01.09 20:49:00
|
11. Sticky:[Rubicon 1.1] Sisters of EVE Battleship - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Kagura Nikon wrote: Steph Livingston wrote: Savira Terrant wrote: Kagura Nikon wrote: People are askign TOO much of a signle ship. With all these bonuses.. the ship should be renamed to MacGyver Au contraire! We want useful bonuses/...
- by Savira Terrant - at 2014.01.09 15:45:00
|
12. Sticky:[Rubicon 1.1] Sisters of EVE Battleship - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
James Amril-Kesh wrote: It warps faster now guys every problem with the ship is totally fixed and it's now worth using. Not. This. Kagura Nikon wrote: People are askign TOO much of a signle ship. With all these bonuses.. the ship should...
- by Savira Terrant - at 2014.01.09 14:50:00
|
13. Sticky:[Rubicon 1.1] Sisters of EVE Battleship - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Shinzhi Xadi wrote: I am disposable wrote: XvXTeacherVxV wrote: Hostility towards devs and other forum posters only discourages developers from engaging threads like this at all. You might not be happy about the state of the Nestor (I'm n...
- by Savira Terrant - at 2014.01.09 09:40:00
|
14. Sticky:[Rubicon 1.1] Sisters of EVE Battleship - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Kagura Nikon wrote: People are REALLY spoiled. THey want a ship with domi bonuses.. both of the,,, abaddon bonus, AND guardian bonus.. and covert ops bonus? WTF guys? ARE YOU GUYS PLAYING THE SAME GAME AS I AM ? We don't want the all at th...
- by Savira Terrant - at 2014.01.08 23:20:00
|
15. Sticky:[Rubicon 1.1] Sisters of EVE Battleship - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
MukkBarovian wrote: Next a jump drive isn't actually an exploration tool at all. Someone has to light a cyno, which means that that person was the explorer, probably in a recon. A jump drive or a covert bridge is a bonus to rapid deployment. F...
- by Savira Terrant - at 2014.01.08 17:27:00
|
16. Sticky:[Rubicon 1.1] Sisters of EVE Battleship - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
CCP Rise wrote: Lots and lots that was already mentioned by CCP before, just repeating the same old without actually adding any new argument. Well, it was you tugging it in the direction of a exploration battleship, before we even heard a...
- by Savira Terrant - at 2014.01.08 12:43:00
|
17. Sticky:[Rubicon 1.1] Sisters of EVE Battleship - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
If CCP really wants to stick with this remote rep stuff - which I don't like at all, just to be clear - I believe that it should have an advantage over the cruisers - not range though, I guess. This can be achieved in a multitude of ways. But my t...
- by Savira Terrant - at 2014.01.07 19:03:00
|
18. Sticky:[Rubicon 1.1] Sisters of EVE Battleship - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
I wish this ship had never happened. Then we could all continue to celebrate the Astero and Nestor, instead of looking at those two as a reminder that they also have an ugly and utterly useless big brother with a description written someone who di...
- by Savira Terrant - at 2014.01.06 22:09:00
|
19. Sticky:[Rubicon 1.1] Sisters of EVE Battleship - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
From the CSM Meeting Minutes in August 2013: Quote: CCP expressed that they will not introduce new ships with clearly overlapping roles in the future. That was a good joke!
- by Savira Terrant - at 2014.01.03 18:03:00
|
20. Bubbles too bright when stacked! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
CCP Mankiller wrote: Done. Loading of clouds is now controlled by the "Effects enabled" option in the system menu. This should be released with Rubicon 1.1, if our graphics QA gives a thumbs up on my change. KUDOS!!
- by Savira Terrant - at 2014.01.03 14:14:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |